<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Andrew Wiggins on How to Play Rush Poker</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.pokernewsdaily.com/andrew-wiggins-on-how-to-play-rush-poker-7732/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.pokernewsdaily.com/andrew-wiggins-on-how-to-play-rush-poker-7732/</link>
	<description>Your one stop shop for poker news.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 09 Feb 2012 19:38:01 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: breadlineguy</title>
		<link>http://www.pokernewsdaily.com/andrew-wiggins-on-how-to-play-rush-poker-7732/comment-page-1/#comment-82064</link>
		<dc:creator>breadlineguy</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 22 Feb 2010 04:23:18 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.pokernewsdaily.com/?p=7732#comment-82064</guid>
		<description>When playing on line - need constant action. Before Rush I would play 9-12 tables at a time. Now I can concentrate on 2 screens and get the same action. I&#039;m up about $500 playing 2 entries at the .10/.25 for about 50 hours. Not great, not horrible. I play top ten hands out of position, typically ram and jam in position.you build up quite a few fpp&#039;s especially at happy hour.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>When playing on line &#8211; need constant action. Before Rush I would play 9-12 tables at a time. Now I can concentrate on 2 screens and get the same action. I&#8217;m up about $500 playing 2 entries at the .10/.25 for about 50 hours. Not great, not horrible. I play top ten hands out of position, typically ram and jam in position.you build up quite a few fpp&#8217;s especially at happy hour.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: dave</title>
		<link>http://www.pokernewsdaily.com/andrew-wiggins-on-how-to-play-rush-poker-7732/comment-page-1/#comment-75031</link>
		<dc:creator>dave</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 26 Jan 2010 02:12:37 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.pokernewsdaily.com/?p=7732#comment-75031</guid>
		<description>Wow. That is some of the worst advice i have ever taken. I wanted to experiment and in following your advice for not even 200 hands, I was down a full buy in. I was playing four tables at once and it was the OPPOSITE of Rush Poker when you&#039;re waiting for the players to fold to you so that you can raise. Perhaps I would need to play more than 200 hands for a sample, but I wanted one buyin to be my stop/loss and obviously it was a good idea because I would have lost even more if I continued. Playing bad hands, even if they randomly connect the board, is the worst, most -EV idea ever. 

Then again, if the point of your comment was to get people to play poorly so that you could exploit it, then... kudos, good sir. Well played.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Wow. That is some of the worst advice i have ever taken. I wanted to experiment and in following your advice for not even 200 hands, I was down a full buy in. I was playing four tables at once and it was the OPPOSITE of Rush Poker when you&#8217;re waiting for the players to fold to you so that you can raise. Perhaps I would need to play more than 200 hands for a sample, but I wanted one buyin to be my stop/loss and obviously it was a good idea because I would have lost even more if I continued. Playing bad hands, even if they randomly connect the board, is the worst, most -EV idea ever. </p>
<p>Then again, if the point of your comment was to get people to play poorly so that you could exploit it, then&#8230; kudos, good sir. Well played.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Peter Finch</title>
		<link>http://www.pokernewsdaily.com/andrew-wiggins-on-how-to-play-rush-poker-7732/comment-page-1/#comment-74419</link>
		<dc:creator>Peter Finch</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 22 Jan 2010 01:17:10 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.pokernewsdaily.com/?p=7732#comment-74419</guid>
		<description>Strategy is very easy in this game.
1. If people fold to you - no matter what hand you have no matter what position raise 3x the BB and you will usually take the blinds every time (around 65-70%). Don&#039;t even look at your cards. People are waiting for big hands and fold is the order of the day. If anyone re-raises you pre flop fold. If anyone calls or raises before you - fold.
2. If one person calls you and you hit nothing on the flop - bet a pot size bet - 70% of the time they will fold right there and then.
3. With 2 callers again if your the first to act - bet the pot even if you have nothing. One may call you - play your normal game after that.
4. If any one re raises - fold 
5. Because of the number of hands, most people who call you will be on high cards, if you call with crap, and the flop hits you - you will be payed off big time.

As no-one can get a read on you - you can use this every single hand and a you will pick up most of the blinds, and most of the pots after the flop. Any hands that go further than that - even if you any win a minority - you will be in front. Your going to win more than you loose - I know, I&#039;ve been doing this for the last couple of days. it will esp. work in the lower stake games.

Its only a matter of time before everyone figures this out. This simply cracks the Rush Poker as being any game of &#039;real poker&#039; at all. Personally, I&#039;m a hopeless player - So my only claim to fame will be this post - the first to provide a winning system to this new form of poker.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Strategy is very easy in this game.<br />
1. If people fold to you &#8211; no matter what hand you have no matter what position raise 3x the BB and you will usually take the blinds every time (around 65-70%). Don&#8217;t even look at your cards. People are waiting for big hands and fold is the order of the day. If anyone re-raises you pre flop fold. If anyone calls or raises before you &#8211; fold.<br />
2. If one person calls you and you hit nothing on the flop &#8211; bet a pot size bet &#8211; 70% of the time they will fold right there and then.<br />
3. With 2 callers again if your the first to act &#8211; bet the pot even if you have nothing. One may call you &#8211; play your normal game after that.<br />
4. If any one re raises &#8211; fold<br />
5. Because of the number of hands, most people who call you will be on high cards, if you call with crap, and the flop hits you &#8211; you will be payed off big time.</p>
<p>As no-one can get a read on you &#8211; you can use this every single hand and a you will pick up most of the blinds, and most of the pots after the flop. Any hands that go further than that &#8211; even if you any win a minority &#8211; you will be in front. Your going to win more than you loose &#8211; I know, I&#8217;ve been doing this for the last couple of days. it will esp. work in the lower stake games.</p>
<p>Its only a matter of time before everyone figures this out. This simply cracks the Rush Poker as being any game of &#8216;real poker&#8217; at all. Personally, I&#8217;m a hopeless player &#8211; So my only claim to fame will be this post &#8211; the first to provide a winning system to this new form of poker.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

