<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Inside the World of Age Verification</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.pokernewsdaily.com/inside-the-world-of-age-verification-972/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.pokernewsdaily.com/inside-the-world-of-age-verification-972/</link>
	<description>Your one stop shop for poker news.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 09 Feb 2012 19:38:01 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Alexia</title>
		<link>http://www.pokernewsdaily.com/inside-the-world-of-age-verification-972/comment-page-1/#comment-32497</link>
		<dc:creator>Alexia</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 10 May 2009 00:31:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.pokernewsdaily.com/?p=972#comment-32497</guid>
		<description>I suppose no one actually cares that Integrity is such a poor system that in some cases you&#039;ve got a better chance of being able to verify using a dead celebrities details than your own? All perfectly legitimate as Aristotle does not ask you to confirm the details you have entered are your own - just that they are true.

Where Integrity is used to verify accounts for adult interactive sites, it generates an unfounded confidence within those who have verified with their data that they&#039;re not interacting with minors.  This is patently untrue.

Whilst using Integrity to verify gives the appearance of addressing the problem, it generates other issues through the deliberate way it has been designed to allow abuse of the process.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I suppose no one actually cares that Integrity is such a poor system that in some cases you&#8217;ve got a better chance of being able to verify using a dead celebrities details than your own? All perfectly legitimate as Aristotle does not ask you to confirm the details you have entered are your own &#8211; just that they are true.</p>
<p>Where Integrity is used to verify accounts for adult interactive sites, it generates an unfounded confidence within those who have verified with their data that they&#8217;re not interacting with minors.  This is patently untrue.</p>
<p>Whilst using Integrity to verify gives the appearance of addressing the problem, it generates other issues through the deliberate way it has been designed to allow abuse of the process.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

