I just returned from a wonderful nine-day Card Player Cruises trip to New England and Canada. The fall foliage was magnificent and the lobster and clams on the East Coast are much, much tastier than their counterparts on the West Coast. I also spent three nights in New York City on each end of the cruise. I’m a theater lover and managed to squeeze in seven Broadway shows. On my must-see recommendation list are Memphis, Superior Donuts, and Bye Bye Birdie.

When I get home from an extended trip, I can hardly wait to catch up on my favorite television shows. Thank goodness for Tivo! I had so many shows waiting. Choices, choices, choices! The obvious choice for the first show I watched was Survivor (I haven’t missed an episode in 19 seasons). After Survivor, the next choice was close, but I opted for the 2009 World Series of Poker (WSOP) Main Event on ESPN (Grey’s Anatomy, Dateline, 60 Minutes, Private Practice, The Good Wife, and Two and a Half Men could wait).

I found myself taking notes to share with my Wednesday Poker Discussion Group, so I will share them with the Poker News Daily readers as well. With more than 6,000 total entrants, I was surprised to learn that only 200 were women. Although women comprised fewer than 3% of the field, there still was one left when they were down to 27 players (more than 99% of the field had already been eliminated). Although I enjoyed watching Leo Margets play, I don’t understand why such a big deal is made out of the “last woman standing.” Outlasting all of the other women doesn’t matter; you haven’t won the event unless you’ve beaten everyone. By the way, I found Margets to be absolutely charming. She was gracious when she was eliminated and was kind enough to sign autographs at that very tough, emotional time.

It seemed like a lot of attention was paid to the fans, a.k.a. “sweaters.” Julie Schneider was a hoot with her “Stack ‘em…stack ‘em to the top” chant every time her husband Tom won a pot. You could see the pride on Barry Greenstein’s face as he watched his son, Joe Sebok, play. As each elimination came, the fans got more vocal and excited and I can’t blame them! The two most loyal fans were Mel and Pat Humphries, who rail Phil Ivey every year. Mel and Pat were on the Card Player Cruises trip with me when these episodes aired. They never told me that they were the same couple who is featured cheering “Ivey, Ivey” when he won a pot.

Peter Eastgate and Dennis Phillips have had outstanding runs in the past two years. What an accomplishment to have made it to the November Nine last year and outlasted more than 99% of the field this year! Who knows how far Phillips would have gone this year if he hadn’t suffered a bad beat to go out in 45th. In case you didn’t see it, his A-K suited got beaten by another A-K suited when his opponent made a flush on the river. Phillips is such a class act; he never complained and wished everyone good luck as he left.

I saw some outstanding folds pre-flop and post-flop; the ability to make a great laydown is what separates the real players from the rest. One hand in particular interested me. The blinds were 25,000/50,000. Eric Buchman raised it to 140,000 and Jeff Shulman re-raised to 500,000 with A-K of hearts. Jonathan Tamayo then went all-in from the small blind for 3.25 million with his pocket queens. Buchman folded. Shulman thought for a while and said, “Sorry guys, this is a big decision.” He asked Tamayo if he wanted action and got no reply. A call by Shulman would have been for almost all of his chips; he laid the hand down and is now in the November Nine. I don’t think most players would have folded in the same spot.

There was a lot of minimum or barely more than minimum raising pre-flop, which baffles me. I also heard lots of, “Will you show me if I fold” questions.

Things sure have changed since I started playing poker. There were so many 21 year-olds in the field. I can only imagine how exciting it must be for them to be playing for so much money and enduring the pressure of playing on television. I enjoyed hearing the story about Ian Tavelli’s grandfather staking him to the Main Event because he kept up a good grade point average (I think my grandfather bought me a new eight-track player when I graduated).

The age statistics were interesting as well. With 21 players remaining, the average age was 31 and the oldest player, Kevin Schaffel, was 51. Tavelli was the youngest and four of the remaining 21 players were eligible to break Eastgate’s record of being the youngest Main Event winner ever.

Someone needs to explain to Norman Chad what a stop and go play is. Twice players executed stop and gos and he couldn’t understand what they were doing. Another time, he called a play in which a player check-called on the flop and then bet about half of the pot on the turn a stop and go. Get with it, Norman!

Here’s a statistic that shocked me: The last time the Main Event was won by anyone who already had a WSOP bracelet was in 2000 (Chris Ferguson). With 23 players remaining, only two of them were prior bracelet winners.

The chip leader going into the final table, Darvin Moon, seems like a really cool guy. He isn’t impressed by all of the lights and cameras. He hasn’t accepted an online endorsement that I know of. He seems very humble and says he’ll be “back to the woods with a chainsaw” when all of this is over. If he wins, it would be great for poker, just like it was when Chris Moneymaker won the title.

In closing, congratulations to Mike Sexton for being the 2009 Poker Hall of Fame inductee. Mike and I have been friends for more than 20 years and he has honored me by asking me to sit at his table during the induction ceremony. I’m sure there will be tales to share with you after that event.

11 Comments

  1. Peter Beck says:

    I thought the hand between Shulman and Tamayo was pretty interesting. And it was good to learn new lingo (“sweaters”). But sorry, I’m still not sure what a stop and go is. Thanks for the article Linda.

  2. Al says:

    Great comments on the WSOP.
    It was interesting to see the average age was 31 – thanks to internet poker.
    Hope you still have the eight-track player!

  3. Ruth Hall says:

    As always, another excellent article written by Linda Johnson! It would be nice if the stop and go plays and squeeze plays were explained in more detail by Norman Chad. Maybe they just want to keep the WSOP on TV easy viewing for the general public and not get technical? Julie Schneider’s “stack em, stack em, to the top” cheer was like nails on a chalkboard, but she did get noticed. Let’s hope the final table will not be edited by ESPN like last year: I think the headsup action shown on TV was only 2 or 3 hands? Very disappointing! Thanks Linda for sharing your views & opinions! (p.s. My money is on Eric Buchman this year.)

  4. Cheryl Logsdon says:

    Here’s a high-five to ESPN’s coverage this year. I think they do a wonderful job of balancing the required TV drama moments with the real poker nitty-gritty. In this economy I am not surprised to see fewer women at the Main Event. We are generally the first in the family to make the sacrifices and put our own goals on hold while we make sure the kids have their schoolbooks and shoes. This PokerMom is looking forward to the day I can enter the Main Event, and when I do my one wish will be to “Run Like Moon.” I hope his lucky star is still shining next week!

  5. Juli Sobka says:

    Again Linda, a very informative article. I’m not sure who I am rooting for. It’s between Phil Ivy and Darvin Moon. I just wish Norman Chad could be replaced. I’m really tired of hearing about all his ex-wives.

    I do hope ESPN does a good job. Again, thanks for writing.

  6. Jojo says:

    Great article Linda and very thought provoking – I too am a diehard “Survivor” fan AND avid followers of the WSOP by ESPN. I feel ESPN has done a great job of covering the play but could cut down the “witty reparteé” – Chad’s ex-wives are dead horses – and I agree with Ruth regarding Tom’s wife. . . Looking forward to the coverage of the November 9!
    GO IVEY!

  7. RI Red says:

    Loved the article Linda, and I agree, much ado about nothing with the last woman standing! I liked ESPN’s coverage so far, I’m hoping they give us a lot more hand-to-hand coverage of the final fable. Love the interesting mix of players, and I’m with the Humpries, I really, really hope the 2009 winner is Mr. Phil Ivey!

  8. sdjen says:

    Thanks for the article Linda…always enjoy and learn from reading them. I was surprised by many plays and wondered if it was the editing. It seemed like a lot of big hands were slow played and got burned this year.

    I definitely agree about the last woman standing. Good for anyone to make it that far, man or woman. Can’t wait for the final table and your insight into that coverage.

  9. bob fisher says:

    Being from New England I was reminded of the leaves turning and Maine lobsters and Ipswich clams. Thanks, Linda, for those reminders!

    As for your TV watching, I’m glad you chose the WSOP. I never tire of hearing about poker, and as you know I love to listen to (and discuss) your insights and ideas. I will be thinking about your comments as I follow the final table playing out.

    Also agree about Mike Sexton’s vast contributions to poker (and the community).

    Thanks again.

  10. Janice says:

    Loved your article, Linda. I loved “sweaters” cheer. It sure brought in the human aspect. I enjoyed all the final table coverage and am anxious to see how ESPN edits it down for the viewing public. They sure have a lot of power in how poker will look to the world. Thnaks for sharing your thoughts with us. As always I loved “hearing” them.

  11. Bella says:

    FANTASTIC ARTICLE!!!

Leave a Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *